Re: Bug#931566: Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true")
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 06:08:23PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 06:01:18PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > I see. Nobody pinged me since then, but it is indeed fixed in the
> > 1.8.5 stable update that at least one release team member was
> > not exited about.
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/compare/1.8.2.2...1.8.5
> >
> > So it's up to the release team if they want 1.8.5 or whether we'll have
> > to cherry-pick a subset of it into a 1.8.2.3. I think my opinion on that
> > is clear - I don't want to maintain a 1.8.2.z branch, it's more work compared
> > to just following the normal stable apt updates, and there's a lot less
> > testing going on.
> >
> Please upload just that fix to buster; I don't care too much about the
> version number you pick.
Is there a buster point release before bullseye release, or should that
be in buster-updates?
Given that buster is going to security support only soon anyway, I don't
mind where I apply security updates to that much :D
But I really do want to cherry-pick at least two other code fixes, and one test
suite fix:
* https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/commit/cfee71c6f2d1478ce4d4ed74ef690ae1350ea403
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/commit/75f452c7309d66548c86a6526cbd65fc51a70039
(really just one change, but it was split over two releases, first
turned error to warning, next one ignores it completely; because it
was in 2 releases in main so I kept it separate :D)
too, they'll make immediate configuration errors non-fatal. Currently
they are fatal in the sense that they are ignored and the upgrade runs
and then it just exits with 1 at the end. So it does not change the
outcome, it just makes the error reporting less silly.
It is very likely that some upgrades on multi-arch systems fail erronously
without them. To be fair, the multi-arch aspect is also fixed by
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/commit/7f65fa3843abc476cbba65c808abc5dd77835815
but that changes ordering results, and is not strictly necessary.
* And I want
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/commit/cfc6870e9b8ad119219ce5dc1871531006bb2d71
to avoid people getting packages removed that stuff still depends on
because their prerm script failed. This might happen during an upgrade
to bullseye, and it's very very likely APT will not be able to recover from it
- I've never successfully recovered a distribution upgrade that had a failure in the
middle (and fwiw, all of them had, but they were my faults, really).
* Also the testsuite-only change in
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/commit/730c5c861c32c9385dc862af8673984b12902343
which makes things work reliably on debci armhf (no regression
potential, wheee)
--
debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev
ubuntu core developer i speak de, en
Reply to: