Bug#986311: marked as done (unblock: debian-cloud-images/0.0.4)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2021 14:38:09 +0200
with message-id <20210411123807.GA5824@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#986311: unblock: debian-cloud-images/0.0.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #986311,
regarding unblock: debian-cloud-images/0.0.4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
986311: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986311
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-cloud-images
Primarily I'm requesting this because this source package provides the
debian-cloud-images-packages package that is a key package (see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929214) and updating the
package in bullseye will update the Depends list to match what is actually
required to build cloud images today.
This package contains a snapshot of the code and configuration used by the
cloud team to generate the images for azure, aws, and openstack. The cloud
team does not build directly from the packages in the archive, but rather
from the salsa repository. So there is no risk of impact to the cloud
images we generate if this package is updated. Keeping the archive package
closer to what's actually used by the cloud team is beneficial to any users
who might be generating their own images based on our configuration.
Thanks
noah
unblock debian-cloud-images/0.0.4
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 09:29:03PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> What do you mean with "it's too late for that"? We *could* (not saying
> we should) drop the package.
I added a hint to remove the package.
Cheers,
Ivo
--- End Message ---
Reply to: