On 2021-04-08 17:45:41 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 05:34:40PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > * Mark #986520 as bullseye-ignore and if a there is a need to fix > > another issues in a bullsey-pu upload, switch CXX to g++-9 in that > > upload. From what I understand, this workaround is supposed to also > > work for 52.0.0. > > Something like that usually is approved for a p-u, as release team > member is your right to decide what to tag bullseye-ignore, but that > would also pretty much hide the bugs from the list of bullseye bugs. If > you really went down that route I'd rather see you use your usertags to > hide it from the udd view only during the release process rather tha > ignore it forever. > And, since this is p-u material in stable, couldn't one upload > 52.0.0-1+deb11u1 to t-p-u just changing CXX? We prefer not to use tpu for such cases. This issue can be fixed via unstable by reverting to 52.0.0 with the +really dance as well. So there is no need to upload the fix via tpu. Cheers > > -- > regards, > Mattia Rizzolo > > GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. > More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : > Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` > Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- -- Sebastian Ramacher
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature