[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#986311: SRM input requested: Re Bug#986311: unblock: debian-cloud-images/0.0.4



Dear SRM colleagues,

Your input/confirmation is appreciated on the following issue. tl;dr;
are you OK with updating debian-cloud-images in the stable release?

On 03-04-2021 21:29, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Noah,
> 
> On 03-04-2021 17:44, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>> It is sufficient for the Depends packages to be available in the next
>> release.
> 
> Unfortunately, our package handling goes per source package, not by
> binary packages.
> 
>>> Should the current package in testing be released with bullseye if we
>>> don't update it?
>>
>> IMO, debian-cloud-images should never have been packaged in Debian in
>> the first place, given that there was no plan to maintain it in the
>> archive and that a "stable" packaged version of it bears only a passing
>> relationship to the cloud images we actually ship, but it's too late for
>> that.
> 
> What do you mean with "it's too late for that"? We *could* (not saying
> we should) drop the package.
> 
>> In an ideal world, the debian-cloud-images package in the stable release
>> would match what generates the images for that release.  However, it
>> moves relatively quickly in order to keep up with changes implemented by
>> the cloud services, so that would require us to update the stable
>> package frequently.  The ability to update cloud related packages for
>> this reason was discussed with the SRMs some time ago, and I understand
>> that they were supportive of allowing such updates in stable point
>> releases.  Practically speaking, we've only ever applied this agreement
>> once, to update cloud-init in buster.
>>
>> If we can't keep the debian-cloud-images package up-to-date in stable
>> releases, then it should not be included.  It's the worst of both worlds
>> and can only cause confusion for users.  I'd be in favor of removing it
>> from buster, too, if that's the case, where it's most definitely out of
>> sync with what's generating the cloud images today.
> 
> If the SRM's are fine with updating the package in stable, I'm happy to
> unblock it. I'll point them to this bug to have them weight in.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: