Your message dated Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:12:37 -0700 with message-id <20210317231237.ruvkwu4nrhf5dm4b@qor.donarmstrong.com> and subject line Please stop reopening bugs that maintainers have closed has caused the Debian Bug report #966373, regarding general: Version for derivatives between binNMU and stable update to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 966373: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966373 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: general: Higher version for uploads to stable and oldstable distributions
- From: Javier Serrano Polo <javier@jasp.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 16:40:23 +0200
- Message-id: <1595860823.2880.14.camel@jasp.net>
- Reply-to: javier--J3TYas0zMadH4isVtuv7arTBn2zylM@jasp.net
Package: general Severity: wishlist For those who care about Debian derivatives: A derivative may be deployed as an overlay rather than a full archive. Modifications from the derivative live together with originals from Debian, but modifications must have a higher version. Full archives use this approach to increase the version: 1-1 → 1-1foo1 This does not work with overlays because of binNMUs: 1-1+b1 > 1-1foo1 1-1+b1 > 1-1foo1+b1 A binNMU may be unnecessary in the derivative. Also, these versions are disruptive: 1-1+b1foo1 1-1+b1foo1+b1 Thus, overlays should use this approach: 1-1 → 1-1.0foo1 However, regular uploads to stable and oldstable distributions may use the same signalization ("+") as binNMUs, so: 1-1+deb1u1 < 1-1.0foo1 Therefore, please use a higher version for these uploads, such as: 1-1 → 1-1.0+deb1u1Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Javier Serrano Polo <javier@jasp.net>, 966373-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>, "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, owner@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Please stop reopening bugs that maintainers have closed
- From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:12:37 -0700
- Message-id: <20210317231237.ruvkwu4nrhf5dm4b@qor.donarmstrong.com>
- Mail-followup-to: owner@bugs.debian.org, Javier Serrano Polo <javier@jasp.net>, 966373-done@bugs.debian.org, Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>, "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, control@bugs.debian.org
- Reply-to: owner@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <1603748738.29689.12.camel@jasp.net>
- References: <1603103584-3742-bts-jcristau@debian.org> <1603748738.29689.12.camel@jasp.net>
tag 966373 wontfix thanks On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 22:45:38 +0100 Javier Serrano Polo <javier@jasp.net> wrote: > Another closure, this time without excuse. It is obviously a mistake, > because Debian derivatives are welcome, right? I will correct this. Please stop reopening bugs which have been closed by Debian Maintainers. If you disagree with the maintainer closing a bug which affects their package, the correct procedure is to discuss the issue with the maintainer respectfully, and attempt to come to a resolution, potentially by preparing patches or otherwise doing the work. Continuing to play bts ping-pong by reopening bugs will result in me (on behalf of owner@bugs.debian.org) removing your ability to modify bugs. -- Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard. -- Justice Roberts in 319 U.S. 624 (1943)
--- End Message ---