Bug#929214: release.debian.org - Add package constraint for cloud images
- To: Ivo De Decker <ivodd@debian.org>, 929214@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#929214: release.debian.org - Add package constraint for cloud images
- From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:14:58 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20210312071457.GA14234@shell.thinkmo.de>
- Reply-to: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>, 929214@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20190612155658.swvsdy7flv5xnrnl@debian.org>
- References: <155826111130.23881.9576437467190115182.reportbug@rockhammer.waldi.eu.org> <155826111130.23881.9576437467190115182.reportbug@rockhammer.waldi.eu.org> <20190612155658.swvsdy7flv5xnrnl@debian.org> <155826111130.23881.9576437467190115182.reportbug@rockhammer.waldi.eu.org>
Hi
Sorry that I missed to follow up on that task for some time.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 05:57:00PM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > | Package: debian-cloud-images-packages
> > | Architecture: amd64
> > | Depends: apparmor, awscli, chrony, cloud-init, cloud-initramfs-growroot, google-compute-engine, grub-cloud-amd64, grub-pc, libpam-systemd, linux-image-amd64, linux-image-cloud-amd64, openssh-server, python, python-boto, python3-boto, sudo, unattended-upgrades, waagent
> >
> > Please acknowledge that such a package would be okay for using as
> > constraint. After that I'll upload that change.
> If you create such a package, having a binary per architecture as you
> describe, should do what you want. It can be added to the list as soon as it
> is in testing.
The binary package is in testing since some time. Please add it to the
key packages list.
Regards,
Bastian
--
You! What PLANET is this!
-- McCoy, "The City on the Edge of Forever", stardate 3134.0
Reply to: