Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Sam On 23-02-2021 19:17, Sam Hartman wrote: > This is just a FYI, opened as a bug because you've expressed a > preference for that communication style. Ack. > I hope to have something in experimental or unstable by end of this > week. Depending on my confidence in the fixes, I may be ready for an > unblock at that point If it's in time to migrate before March 12, there's nothing to unblock. We're still only in soft freeze and pam is not on our build-essentials list. > or I may want to ask for additional review > before I'm ready to recommend inclusion in testing. Be aware that we're no PAM experts. At least, I have no clue. > * 982530: removal of pam_tally Severity currently is "normal", sounds like that not correct? At least it means it's not on our radar. > Plan is to detect the situation and scream in the preinst. > Down side is that means new strings that need translation (debconf templates) And how about mentioning this in the release notes? > * 982295: pam won't deal with upgrades without an init script "Only" severity important, again, do you think that is correct? Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature