[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#979750: marked as done (transition: skalibs execline s6)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Jan 2021 21:05:02 +0100
with message-id <YBB17kfhMygI3w82@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#979750: transition: skalibs execline s6
has caused the Debian Bug report #979750,
regarding transition: skalibs execline s6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
979750: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979750
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: zhsj@debian.org

Hi,

Skarnet.org softwares just released a new version today...

http://skarnet.org/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?1:mss:1515:202101:mhcdpginfgieagphalne

I have packaged three of them, which are skalibs, execline and s6.

They both have SO bump this time. There's no reverse depend except for
themselves.

I have uploaded them to experimental, and still wait for the NEW queue.
Can this be warranted for the "Soft Freeze" deadline as no other
packages are involved.

Thanks

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2021-01-11 11:31:39 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: zhsj@debian.org
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Skarnet.org softwares just released a new version today...
> 
> http://skarnet.org/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?1:mss:1515:202101:mhcdpginfgieagphalne
> 
> I have packaged three of them, which are skalibs, execline and s6.
> 
> They both have SO bump this time. There's no reverse depend except for
> themselves.
> 
> I have uploaded them to experimental, and still wait for the NEW queue.
> Can this be warranted for the "Soft Freeze" deadline as no other
> packages are involved.

skalibs, execline and s6 migrated. Closing.

Cheers

> 
> Thanks
> 

-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: