Your message dated Sat, 16 Jan 2021 09:19:51 +0100 with message-id <YAKhp5/HeNY3Z6TK@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#979084: transition: hamlib has caused the Debian Bug report #979084, regarding transition: hamlib to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 979084: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979084 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: hamlib
- From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 16:59:03 +0100
- Message-id: <X/CYRzST7heNKP8P@msg.df7cb.de>
- Mail-followup-to: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>, Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, hamlib has finally released a new version which would be very valuable to have in Debian/bullseye since the old version is missing support for any hamradio transceivers sold in the last two years. The new version has been uploaded to experimental. There are 15 reverse dependencies, all within the Debian Hamradio Team. I recompiled these, and the only one failing is "grig" which is dead upstream and should likely be removed anyway. Manual tests have revealed no problems either. (There is one minor glitch in wsjtx but I hope to address that.) I'm sorry for this very late change but upstream has released this only two days ago... Ben file: title = "hamlib"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libhamlib2" | .depends ~ "libhamlib2++c2" | .depends ~ "libhamlib4" | .depends ~ "libhamlib++4"; is_good = .depends ~ "libhamlib4" | .depends ~ "libhamlib++4"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libhamlib2" | .depends ~ "libhamlib2++c2"; (Unsure if the ++ signs need quoting.) Are we ok to go ahead? Thanks, Christoph
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>, 979084-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#979084: transition: hamlib
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 09:19:51 +0100
- Message-id: <YAKhp5/HeNY3Z6TK@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <X/CYRzST7heNKP8P@msg.df7cb.de>
- References: <X/CYRzST7heNKP8P@msg.df7cb.de>
On 2021-01-02 16:59:03 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi, > > hamlib has finally released a new version which would be very valuable > to have in Debian/bullseye since the old version is missing support > for any hamradio transceivers sold in the last two years. > > The new version has been uploaded to experimental. There are 15 > reverse dependencies, all within the Debian Hamradio Team. I > recompiled these, and the only one failing is "grig" which is dead > upstream and should likely be removed anyway. Manual tests have > revealed no problems either. (There is one minor glitch in wsjtx but I > hope to address that.) > > I'm sorry for this very late change but upstream has released this > only two days ago... The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing Cheers > > Ben file: > > title = "hamlib"; > is_affected = .depends ~ "libhamlib2" | .depends ~ "libhamlib2++c2" | .depends ~ "libhamlib4" | .depends ~ "libhamlib++4"; > is_good = .depends ~ "libhamlib4" | .depends ~ "libhamlib++4"; > is_bad = .depends ~ "libhamlib2" | .depends ~ "libhamlib2++c2"; > > (Unsure if the ++ signs need quoting.) > > Are we ok to go ahead? > > Thanks, > Christoph > -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---