[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: slurm-wlm transition to testing



Hi Gennaro

On 2020-12-11 02:03:40 +0100, Gennaro Oliva wrote:
> Hi team,
> 
> the autopkgtest for the slurm-wlm package is failing on ppc64el because
> mariadb is not starting in the autopkgtest environment as you can see
> here:
> 
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/ppc64el/s/slurm-wlm/8577097/log.gz
> 
> I filed a bug against mariadb-server #977114 for this problem.

I've added a hint to ignore this issue.

> The autopkgtest also fails to test using the old source package as you
> can see here:
> 
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=slurm-wlm
> 
> This is due to the fact that in the new version I removed the "-llnl"
> suffix from the name of the configuration directory so the old test
> script can't be used anymore.

The issue here is the source package rename. slurm-wlm took over all
binary packages from slurm-llnl. In this case, britney scheduled tests
for slurm-llnl with the binary packages built from slurm-wlm. I don't
think this test should be triggered.

Paul, what do you think?

Regarding the configuration directory rename: is this rename handled in
the package upgrade? Is the old config copied to the new location or is
incompatible?

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: