[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#968065: marked as done (nmu: libheif_1.6.1-1)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Aug 2020 08:41:17 +0200
with message-id <20200808064117.GA3114058@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#968065: nmu: libheif_1.6.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #968065,
regarding nmu: libheif_1.6.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
968065: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968065
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu libheif_1.6.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libjpeg-turbo that has bug 966409 fixed"


Package: libheif-examples
Depends: ..., libjpeg62-turbo (>= 2.0.2), ...

Due to #966409 this misses the epoch, and the dependency
could wrongly be fulfilled by the buster libjpeg62-turbo.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2020-08-07 22:26:54 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> nmu libheif_1.6.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libjpeg-turbo that has bug 966409 fixed"
> 
> 
> Package: libheif-examples
> Depends: ..., libjpeg62-turbo (>= 2.0.2), ...
> 
> Due to #966409 this misses the epoch, and the dependency
> could wrongly be fulfilled by the buster libjpeg62-turbo.

Scheduled.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: