Bug#961195: transition: glibc
On 13/07/2020 21:39, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2020-07-13 20:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> Hi Aurelien,
>>
>> On 13/07/2020 19:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> On 2020-07-11 18:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> block 961195 with 955368 964223 964225 964226 964220 964227 964229 964231
>>>> thanks
>>>
>>> Does it mean that we need to have those bugs fixed before starting the
>>> transition?
>>
>> No, I just wanted to get them in the BTS, as that would tell me at any given
>> time how many are still open.
>
> Ok, thanks for the explanation. I'll upload fixes to the delayed queue
> to fix them.
>
>>> Or can we start the transition and fix them at the same
>>> time?
>>
>> Yeah, let's go ahead and do that.
>
> Ok, thanks. I have just uploaded the package to unstable.
It's built on all release architectures now. I have scheduled the binNMUs with
the --extra-depends on libc-bin as usual.
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: