[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#962867: marked as done (transition: qtbase-opensource-src)

Your message dated Fri, 3 Jul 2020 08:26:01 +0200
with message-id <20200703062601.GA1787384@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#962867: transition: qtbase-opensource-src
has caused the Debian Bug report #962867,
regarding transition: qtbase-opensource-src
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
962867: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962867
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: block -1 by 960953 960954

Dear Release team,

We (the Qt maintainers) are almost ready to start a transition for the
new major Qt version: 5.14.2 instead of 5.12.5.

It is not the latest release, but we consider 5.14.2 to be more stable
than 5.15.0.

As usual, we have two sub-transitions:

title = "qtbase-opensource-src";
is_affected = .depends ~ "qtbase-abi-5-12-5" | .depends ~ "qtbase-abi-5-14-2";
is_good = .depends ~ "qtbase-abi-5-14-2";
is_bad = .depends ~ "qtbase-abi-5-12-5";

and

title = "qtdeclarative-opensource-src";
is_affected = .depends ~ "qtdeclarative-abi-5-12-5" | .depends ~ "qtdeclarative-abi-5-14-2";
is_good = .depends ~ "qtdeclarative-abi-5-14-2";
is_bad = .depends ~ "qtdeclarative-abi-5-12-5";

At the same time, qbs will be updated to 1.16.0 (only qtcreator is affected).

Right now there are two blocking bugs: fix for one of them is in the deferred
queue, the other one is blocked by another qgis FTBFS (#962641) but I hope
it will be fixed soon.

--
Dmitry Shachnev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2020-06-27 20:54:21 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi Sebastian!
> 
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 06:16:59PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Thanks for taking care of qtcreator!
> >
> > There are some autopkgtest regressions though. Most of them look
> > temporary issues due to uninstallability.
> 
> Please binNMU also pyqt5chart. It needs a rebuild because
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-74752 was fixed, and private
> symbols are now properly marked as such.
> 
> I am looking at the remaining broken builds and autopkgtests.

Everything migrated:

qtbase-opensource-src        | 5.14.2+dfsg-4 | testing    | source
qtdeclarative-opensource-src | 5.14.2+dfsg-2 | testing    | source

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: