Bug#956183: transition: libwmf

[Yangfl <mmyangfl@gmail.com>]

Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> 于2020年4月25日周六 下午8:27写道：
>
> On 08/04/2020 07:02, Yangfl wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > libwmf is released with package split, and old-style config script
> > dropped with pkg-config file introduced. There are three packages
> > needing patches against `libwmf-config':
> >
> >   wv
> >   gimp
> >   abiword
> >
> > and two packages which should only require binNMU:
> >
> >   graphicsmagick
> >   imagemagick
> >
> > I didn't do a test rebuild of these packages, because full rebuild
> > would take too long time. The new version of libwmf should not have
> > any API/ABI breakage, so I don't expect any ftbfs.
>
> It would be good to disentangle the package split (which due to the Breaks will
> mean we need a lockstep transition with all or most packages migrating at the
> same time) from the libwmf-config removal. If you reintroduce the script and the
> rdeps build against the new libwmf version, then we can go ahead with this, and
> libwmf-config could be removed after the transition. Otherwise we'll need to
> wait until those packages are fixed.
>
> Cheers,
> Emilio

https://salsa.debian.org/yangfl-guest/libwmf/-/commit/a542eed89c98bde74d410f6ea07ab7a3be77ebab

Readded libwmf-config into /usr/bin. If that's ok we can upload it to
unstable, and the transition should only require binNMU.