Bug#956890: buster-pu: package zfs-linux/0.7.12-2+deb10u2

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 15:52 +0000, Mo Zhou wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 03:25:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 05:21 +0000, Mo Zhou wrote:
> > > The whole fix involes two parts: a part goes to src:zfs-linux and
> > > the
> > > other goes to src:spl-linux. Now that the updated src:spl-linux
> > > is
> > > already uploaded, and I'm now asking for the permission to upload
> > > the
> > > updated src:zfs-linux. Which includes two upstream commits fixing
> > > potential deadlock issues.
> > 
> > What happens if a user tries using the current spl-dkms with the
> > newer
> > zfs-dkms, or vice versa?
> 
> I forgot to add Depends: spl-dkms (>= 0.7.12-2+deb10u1, s-p-u) into
> the debdiff of zfs-linux.

OK. With that change included, please feel free to go ahead.

> Actually zfs-linux (= 0.7.12-2+deb10u1, buster) have no problem to
> build atop spl-linux (= 0.7.12-2, buster) or (= 0.7.12-2+deb10u1, s-
> p-u); while zfs-linux (= 0.7.12-2+deb10u2, s-p-u) will FTBFS atop
> spl-linux  (= 0.7.12-2, buster)
> 

So it's fine to accept spl-linux now, without causing any issues?

Regards,

Adam