Bug#893006: stretch-pu: package boost1.62/1.62.0+dfsg-4+deb9u1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 10:25:30PM +0200, Philipp Huebner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 02.04.2018 um 12:57 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 14:51:10 +0100, Philipp Huebner wrote:
> >> I would like to fix #883987 in boost1.62 for Stretch.
> >> The changes are basically the same as what is currently in testing and I got the
> >> maintainer's go-ahead in
> >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-boost-devel/2018-March/004184.html
> >>
> > What made these partial specializations not be necessary anymore? That
> > seems like critical missing information if we are to make a decision
> > here, to know if/what we might be breaking instead.
>
> my guess is that only upstream can really answer that.
>
> My work colleague confirmed that we're basically using the same code as
> in the example at the upstream bug tracker and it fails when using gcc-6
> on Stretch:
> https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/12534
>
>
> Best wishes,
> --
> .''`. Philipp Huebner <debalance@debian.org>
> : :' : pgp fp: 6719 25C5 B8CD E74A 5225 3DF9 E5CA 8C49 25E4 205F
> `. `'`
> `-
>
Reply to: