Bug#955807: transition: netcdf
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 2020-04-05 08:26:10, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-netcdf.html
> Control: block -1 by 955715 955749 955806
>
> NetCDF bumped it SONAME requiring a transition.
>
> Most rdeps built successfully except adios, oasis3 & metview as
> summarized below.
>
>
> Transition: netcdf
>
> libnetcdf15 (1:4.7.3-1+b1) -> libnetcdf18 (1:4.7.4-1~exp2)
>
> The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows.
>
> adios (1.13.1-21) FTBFS (#955715)
> cmor (3.5.0-3) OK
> coda (2.21-4) SKIP (B-D only)
> dx (1:4.4.4-12) OK
> eccodes (2.17.0-1) OK
> exodusii (6.02.dfsg.1-8) OK
> gdal (3.0.4+dfsg-1) OK
> gerris (20131206+dfsg-19) SKIP (B-D only)
> grace (1:5.1.25-7) OK
> grads (3:2.2.1-2) OK
> gri (2.12.26-1) SKIP (B-D only)
> kst (2.0.8-3) SKIP (B-D only)
> labplot (2.7.0-1) OK
> libminc (2.4.03-2) OK
> libpdl-netcdf-perl (4.20-6) OK
> nco (4.9.1-1) OK
> ncview (2.1.8+ds-3) OK
> netcdf-cxx (4.3.1-2) OK
> netcdf-cxx-legacy (4.2-11) OK
> netcdf-fortran (4.5.2+ds-1) OK
> netcdf4-python (1.5.3-1) OK
> octave-netcdf (1.0.13-1) OK
> r-cran-ncdf4 (1.17-1) OK
> r-cran-rnetcdf (2.1-1-1) OK
> ruby-netcdf (0.7.2-3) OK
> v-sim (3.7.2-8) OK
>
> cdftools (3.0.2-4) SKIP (B-D only)
> deal.ii (9.1.1-9) SKIP (B-D only)
> emoslib (2:4.5.9-3) SKIP (B-D only)
> etsf-io (1.0.4-4) SKIP (B-D only)
> ferret-vis (7.5.0-2) OK
> gmt (6.0.0+dfsg-1) OK
> gnudatalanguage (0.9.9-12) OK
> grass (7.8.2-1) OK
> harp (1.9.2-1) OK
> minc-tools (2.3.00+dfsg-3) OK
> ncl (6.6.2-1) OK
> oasis3 (3.mct+dfsg.121022-14) FTBFS (#955749)
> paraview (5.7.0-4) SKIP (B-D only)
> python-escript (5.5-5) SKIP (B-D only)
> vtk6 (6.3.0+dfsg2-5) OK
> vtk7 (7.1.1+dfsg2-2) OK
>
> lammps (20191120+dfsg1-2) OK
> odb-api (0.18.1-10) SKIP (B-D only)
> pyferret (7.5.0-5) OK
> qgis (3.10.4+dfsg-1) OK
>
> magics++ (4.3.0-1) OK
>
> cdo (1.9.9~rc2-1) OK
> metview (5.8.1-2) FTBFS (#955806)
Please go ahead.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: