--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu aac-tactics_8.11.0-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against coq 8.11.0-1+b1"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 10/04/2020 12:27, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Hi,
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:32:41AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> On 09/04/2020 10:51, Ralf Treinen wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: binnmu
>>>
>>> nmu aac-tactics_8.11.0-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against coq 8.11.0-1+b1"
>>
>> Package: coq
>> Source: coq (8.11.0-1)
>> Version: 8.11.0-1+b1
>> Provides: coq-8.11.0+4.08.1
>>
>>
>> Package: libaac-tactics-coq
>> Source: aac-tactics
>> Version: 8.11.0-1
>> Architecture: all
>> Depends: libaac-tactics-ocaml (>= 8.11.0-1), coq-8.11.0+4.08.1
>>
>> So I don't see why a rebuild is needed. Maybe it's because of another package,
>> so it would help if the request had been clearer, so I don't have to be looking
>> around and guessing. Can you clarify why this is needed?
>>
>> Besides if it's because of libaac-tactics-coq, since it's arch:all it can't be
>> binNMU'ed (the ocaml bindings can, but those don't seem to depend on coq).
>
> It is not for libaac-tactics-coq, I know that it cannot be binNMUed,
> and it is not neccesarry. It is for libaac-tactics-ocaml and
> libaac-tactics-ocaml-dev which are Architecture=any, and which are
> now not installable since coq has been recompiled to version 8.11.0-1.b1.
>
> AFAICS, this will block the migration of lablgtk3 3.1.0, and of the
> recompiled coq.
>
> Sorry for not having explained that in my bug report.
Oh, I saw that provides and thought it would be due to that. I have scheduled
the binNMUs now (which appeared on the ocaml binnmu list too).
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---