On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 11:29 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 27/03/2020 14:27, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 13:32 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > > > On 22/03/2020 13:31, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > Severity: normal > > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > > > Usertags: transition > > > > X-Debbugs-CC: zigo@debian.org > > > > pkg-dpdk-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org > > > > > > > > Dear Release Team, > > > > > > > > The new DPDK 19.11 LTS is ready for unstable/testing, and we > > > > wish > > > > to > > > > begin the transition. It was already uploaded to experimental: > > > > > > > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dpdk > > > > > > > > The reverse dependencies are collectd and openvswitch: > > > > > > > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/collectd > > > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openvswitch > > > > > > > > Collectd rebuilds without any changes. Openvswitch needs a new > > > > version, > > > > 2.13, which Thomas already uploaded to experimental and that is > > > > ready > > > > for unstable. > > > > > > > > There's no auto-transition tracker for some reason, if I > > > > understand > > > > the > > > > obscure syntax it should be something like: > > > > > > > > Affected: .build-depends ~ /libdpdk-dev/ > > > > Good: .depends ~ /librte-eal20.0/ > > > > Bad: .depends ~ /librte-eal18.11/ > > > > > > There's no automatic tracker because librte-eal18.11 has no > > > reverse > > > dependencies. collectd only recommends it (via shlibs:Recommends, > > > so > > > we can > > > binNMU it) and I don't see openvswitch having any kind of > > > dependency > > > on > > > librte-eal18.11. Am I missing something? > > > > > > In any case you can go ahead already. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Emilio > > > > Uploaded to sid. Thomas, please go ahead and upload the new version > > of > > OVS once the builds are done. > > > > OVS doesn't link directly to the libraries, but dlopen() them (or > > something along those lines). It depends on the generic dpdk binary > > package which pulls in everything that is needed for that. > > dpdk has migrated to testing, and since there's no tracker for us to > follow > progress, I'll assume this is done and am closing the report. > > If something is still missing and needs action from us (e.g. some > binNMUs), > please let us know and will look at it. > > Cheers, > Emilio Both openvswitch and collectd had new source uploads shortly after the dpdk upload, and the resulting binaries linked with the new version have migrated to testing for both reverse dependencies, so we are indeed all good. Thanks! -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part