Your message dated Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:05:02 +0100 with message-id <efa92508-a9f1-0609-7a05-f0fd3a824046@debian.org> and subject line Re: migrate only packages built on at least two architectures has caused the Debian Bug report #733411, regarding migrate only packages built on at least two architectures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 733411: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733411 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: migrate only packages built on at least two architectures
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@ayous.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 20:32:31 +0100
- Message-id: <20131228193231.GW12772@mails.so.argh.org>
Package: release.debian.org User: debian-release@lists.debian.org Usertags: britney Hi, as just discussed on IRC, it would be nice if britney would only migrate packages to testing which are available on at least two architectures (so that we know it had been autobuilt at least once). (For the few exceptions which are only relevant for a single architecture, there would need to be a hint like "singlearch package", and also an initial cleanup before activating it sounds a good idea.) Reasoning behind is that as of now britney doesn't get aware if brand new packages FTBFS everywhere e.g. because of broken build dependencies, but would happly migrate such a package to testing (which then couldn't been built in a clean chroot), because the package is current on all architectures it was ever built on. Forcing human work to file RC bugs fast enough doesn't seem reliable, especially if we could automatically detect it. Thanks, Andi
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 733411-done@bugs.debian.org, Andreas Barth <aba@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: migrate only packages built on at least two architectures
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:05:02 +0100
- Message-id: <efa92508-a9f1-0609-7a05-f0fd3a824046@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20131228193231.GW12772@mails.so.argh.org>
- References: <20131228193231.GW12772@mails.so.argh.org> <20131228193231.GW12772@mails.so.argh.org>
Hi Andreas, On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 20:32:31 +0100 Andreas Barth <aba@ayous.org> wrote: > as just discussed on IRC, it would be nice if britney would only > migrate packages to testing which are available on at least two > architectures (so that we know it had been autobuilt at least once). >> (For the few exceptions which are only relevant for a single > architecture, there would need to be a hint like "singlearch package", > and also an initial cleanup before activating it sounds a good idea.) > > Reasoning behind is that as of now britney doesn't get aware if > brand new packages FTBFS everywhere e.g. because of broken build > dependencies, but would happly migrate such a package to testing > (which then couldn't been built in a clean chroot), because the > package is current on all architectures it was ever built on. Forcing > human work to file RC bugs fast enough doesn't seem reliable, > especially if we could automatically detect it. We now explicitly only allow migration of packages that have been built on a buildd. So I think this bug can be closed because that is what you wanted to achieve. PaulAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---