Bug#952845: transition: proj
On 18/03/2020 20:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 3/18/20 7:02 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 3/18/20 10:49 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 18/03/2020 09:56, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 3/18/20 12:41 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>> On 01/03/2020 11:03, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>>> Severity: normal
>>>>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>>>>> Usertags: transition
>>>>>> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-proj.html
>>>>>> Control: block -1 by 951655 951656
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to PROJ 7.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not such a major change as the previous transition to PROJ 6 (#931949).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There were a few FTBFS with the RCs in experimental, but all except r-cran-sf
>>>>>> have been fixed in the mean time. There is a patch in the BTS for r-cran-sf,
>>>>>> which also fixes the FTBFS of r-cran-lwgeom when r-cran-sf is rebuilt.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's go ahead.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> proj (7.0.0-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is built & installed on
>>>> all release architectures.
>>>
>>> And now on the non-release architectures too. binNMUs scheduled.
>>
>> Please give back therion, r-cran-rgdal & r-cran-sf with a dep-wait on
>> libproj-dev (>= 7.0.0-2), that fixes the pkg-config issues.
>>
>> Once r-cran-sf has been rebuilt successfully r-cran-lwgeom should built
>> successfully too.
>>
>> openorienteering-mapper should build successfully now that gdal has been
>> rebuilt with PROJ 7. This may be the fix for qgis too.
>
> Please also binNMU the affected packages in experimental:
>
> Dependency level 1
>
> * gnudatalanguage (1.0.0~rc.1+dfsg-3)
> * postgis (3.1.0~alpha1+dfsg-1~exp2)
> * python-cartopy (0.18.0~b1+dfsg-1~exp2)
> * spatialite (5.0.0~beta0-1~exp4)
Done those for now.
Emilio
>
> Dependency level 2
>
> * spatialite-tools (4.4.0~rc1-1~exp5)
>
> Dependency level 3
>
> * spatialite-gui (2.1.0~beta0+really2.1.0~beta0-1~exp5)
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Bas
>
Reply to: