[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#953286: marked as done (RM: node-srs/0.4.8+dfsg-4)

Your message dated Sat, 7 Mar 2020 08:15:23 +0100
with message-id <8756ca69-bbfa-03bf-0cad-ec37a9f0b821@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#953286: RM: node-srs/0.4.8+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #953286,
regarding RM: node-srs/0.4.8+dfsg-4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
953286: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953286
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Hi,

current node-srs is not compatible with Node.js ≥ 12. Upgrade is not
possible for now since it requires an update of libgdal (and upgraded
version is not compatible with Node.js ≥ 12 too).

To help Node.js 12 migration, I would like to ask for its testing-only
removal with node-millstone, its reverse dependency.

Cheers,
Xavier

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Le 07/03/2020 à 07:59, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit :
> On 3/7/20 7:30 AM, Xavier Guimard wrote:
>> current node-srs is not compatible with Node.js ≥ 12. Upgrade is not
>> possible for now since it requires an update of libgdal (and upgraded
>> version is not compatible with Node.js ≥ 12 too).
> 
> You most likely mean node-gdal.

Hi,

sorry, I was confused by another discussion (there is no node-gdal in
Debian).

>> To help Node.js 12 migration, I would like to ask for its testing-only
>> removal with node-millstone, its reverse dependency.

and I didn't remember to have already ask for that

Cheers,
Xavier

> node-carto, node-millstone & node-srs are already removed from testing:
> 
> node-carto     | 0.9.5-2         | oldoldstable   | source, all
> node-carto     | 0.9.5-2         | oldstable      | source, all
> node-carto     | 0.9.5-2         | unstable       | source, all
> node-millstone | 0.6.8-1         | oldoldstable   | source, all
> node-millstone | 0.6.17-2        | stable         | source, all
> node-millstone | 0.6.17-2        | unstable       | source, all
> node-srs       | 0.3.2+ds1-1     | oldoldstable   | source
> node-srs       | 0.3.2+ds1-1+b1  | oldoldstable   | amd64, armel, armhf,
> i386
> node-srs       | 0.4.8+dfsg-3    | oldstable      | source, amd64,
> arm64, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
> node-srs       | 0.4.8+dfsg-4    | stable         | source, amd64,
> arm64, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
> node-srs       | 0.4.8+dfsg-4    | unstable       | source
> node-srs       | 0.4.8+dfsg-4    | unstable-debug | source
> node-srs       | 0.4.8+dfsg-4+b1 | unstable       | amd64, arm64, armhf,
> i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
> 
> In my opinion they should be removed from unstable too, but
> debian-release is not the appropriate avenue for that.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> 
> Bas
>

--- End Message ---
Reply to: