[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#948722: qemu-block-extra, (build-)dependencies unsatisfiable on mipsel.



On 2020-01-16 00:55, peter green wrote:
It seems that with version 1.4.2.5-1 mipsel was quietly re-added to
the achitecture list, I do not know if this was a mistake or if the
maintainer was deliberately testing if the problem had gone away.
Either way ceph has continued to fail to build on mipsel.

That was actually only planned to happen for experimental, but
was accidentally merged to unstable.


I'm not going to play severity ping-pong with you, but I am ccing the
ceph maintainers and the release team in-case they want to give a
position on this.

My position is easy: if you either fix clang #947886 or g++ #947886,
then this issue will go away. There is nothing I can do about it,
I've tested all useful combinations of memory-saving flags on ceph.

As long as this does not happen, qemu needs to drop support for
ceph on mipsel.

What I can try is to build with clang-9 and see if that helps,
but so far please remove ceph support from qemu on mipsel and
be done.

The other option would be to remove qemu from mipsel as I'd assume
that the architectures is too slow to be useful for qemu anyway.


--
 Bernd Zeimetz                            Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.de                                http://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485  DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F


Reply to: