[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#944294: buster-pu: package libvirt-daemon/5.0.0-4



Hi Guido,

Please, do you please now when will be new updated version in buster-updated ? 

Thank you,
Michal Arbet (kevko)

st 25. 12. 2019 v 16:42 odesílatel Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org> napsal:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 02:56:17PM +0100, Michal Arbet wrote:
> Hi guido,
>
> Thank you very much for including my patches .
> I only want to ask one question, why you removed patch which is adding test
> for remove cpu features osxsave and ospke ?
> In my previous debdiff it was included ->
> https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=b51bfa70554f4bc43cbd6841b78d67b391909184

Mostly to make the debdiff as small as possible since there's another
test dropping the flags which does the trick for buster I assume.

Cheers,
 -- Guido


>
> Thanks,
> Michal Arbet ( kevko )
>
>
> čt 5. 12. 2019 v 13:59 odesílatel Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org> napsal:
>
> > Hi,
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 12:56:17PM +0100, Michal Arbet wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Debdiff is empty.
> > > Please, could you resend ?
> >
> > odd, where did that go. Updated one attached.
> >  -- Guido
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Michal Arbet ( kevko )
> > >
> > > čt 5. 12. 2019 v 1:01 odesílatel Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org> napsal:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 05:52:33PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 04:17:13PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > > > Control: tags -1 -confirmed +moreinfo
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2019-11-27 16:07, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi Adam,
> > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 01:21:40PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > > > > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 2019-11-27 13:05, Michal Arbet wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I've added a patch from upstream ( sid already included it
> > in new
> > > > > > > > > version ).
> > > > > > > > > Check current debdiff in attachment.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > That looks OK, assuming it's been build- and runtime-tested on
> > a
> > > > > > > > buster
> > > > > > > > system.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It would be nice to coordinate such things with the package
> > > > > > > maintainers. I've had question's regarding these patches which
> > > > weren't
> > > > > > > answered yet:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >     https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944248#26
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apologies for that, we tend to assume that people making such
> > requests
> > > > > > either work on the package or have had that co-ordination
> > discussion
> > > > > > already.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In this case I'll put the request on hold until we hear back.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.I intend to look at the particular issue and fold it into the
> > > > > update with
> > > > >
> > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939036
> > > > >
> > > > > which is still pending.
> > > >
> > > > Attached is the debdiff with #933036 included as well. O.k. to upload
> > to
> > > > stable-p-u?
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >  -- Guido
> > > >
> > > > >  -- Guido
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Adam
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >

Reply to: