[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#977720: marked as done (transition: http-parser)

Your message dated Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:13:06 +0100
with message-id <X98VonsfgfjT94UH@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#977720: transition: http-parser
has caused the Debian Bug report #977720,
regarding transition: http-parser
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
977720: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977720
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hello,

the http-parser library should see an update from 2.9.2 (unstable) and
2.9.3 (experimental) to 2.9.4. Now I am unsure whether this requires a
transition - at least the 2.9.3 upload did not lead to an auto- entry in
the transition page.

So please advise. If I may upload to unstable right away, just let me
know and close this bug. Else I'd follow-up with all the details needed.

In case the following sheds some light on the: The name of the binary
package ("libhttp-parser2.9") does not change.

Aside, I am aware 2.9.4-1 FTB in i386, fix ist already in the queue.

Kind regards,

    Christoph

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2020-12-19 15:53:09 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hello,
> 
> the http-parser library should see an update from 2.9.2 (unstable) and
> 2.9.3 (experimental) to 2.9.4. Now I am unsure whether this requires a
> transition - at least the 2.9.3 upload did not lead to an auto- entry in
> the transition page.
> 
> So please advise. If I may upload to unstable right away, just let me
> know and close this bug. Else I'd follow-up with all the details needed.
> 
> In case the following sheds some light on the: The name of the binary
> package ("libhttp-parser2.9") does not change.

So this does not require a transition.

Cheers

> 
> Aside, I am aware 2.9.4-1 FTB in i386, fix ist already in the queue.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
>     Christoph



-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: