Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1
On Sat, 2020-11-28 at 11:07 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 04:56:28PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-11-28 at 08:01 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 05:10:39PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 08:23:45PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> > > > > -with_check = disabled for this upload
> > > > > +# with_check = disabled for this upload
> > > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > FTR, this change increases the build time on zero architectures
> > > > by
> > > > half a week of running tests.
> > > >
> > > > E.g. on mipsel-osuosl-01 that is currently building mips64el
> > > > this
> > > > adds 3 days 23 hours to the buildtime.[1]
> > > >
> > > > Which is a bit wasteful since failures are ignored and a 3
> > > > digit
> > > > number of tests fail on all release architectures.
> > [...]
> > > Ugh, that is unfortunate. The "with_check" change is there to
> > > keep
> > > the package as close to the version in testing/unstable as
> > > feasible. The only sourceful packaging difference is the build-
> > > dep
> > > on g++-8 instead of g++-10.
> > >
> > > Adam expressed concerns about the change as well. Do I need to
> > > prepare another upload?
> >
> > Given that this weekend is the freeze for the point release, that
> > might
> > be safest, just in case the builds show any issues. It's at least
> > not a
> > regression from the version currently in buster.
>
> I assumed that I needed to bump the revision instead of overwriting
> deb10u1; debdiff for the deb10u2 source package attached.
That's correct.
> Let me know if that looks okay and I can proceed with the upload.
As this is the second revision, it doesn't need the:
+ * Rebuild for Buster (Closes: #975728)
but if it makes it easier to get the upload sorted more quickly then I
also don't mind it being included. Please feel free to upload.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: