Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-armadillo.html Hi Kumar On 2020-10-17 22:15:24 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear Release Team, > > I wish to update armadillo in unstable. A binNMU should suffice for > all reverse dependencies. Please let me know your opinion. Did you check if the reverse dependencies build against the new versuin of armadillo? Cheers > > Thanks. > > Kumar > > Ben file: > > title = "armadillo"; > is_affected = .depends ~ "libarmadillo9" | .depends ~ "libarmadillo10"; > is_good = .depends ~ "libarmadillo10"; > is_bad = .depends ~ "libarmadillo9"; > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: bullseye/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads) > Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE > Locale: LANG=en_IN.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_IN.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > LSM: AppArmor: enabled > > -- > Kumar Appaiah > -- Sebastian Ramacher
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature