Hello Sebastian,
Am Sonntag, den 04.10.2020, 16:39 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On 2020-09-29 08:36:46 +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: binnmu
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > please rebuild the following packages to use the new lib after rename libsane to
> > libsane1.
> >
> >
> > nmu colord_1.4.4-2 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> > nmu gimagereader_3.3.1-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> > nmu hplip_3.20.5+dfsg0-3 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> > nmu haskell-bindings-sane_0.0.1-13 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> > nmu libimage-sane-perl_5-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> > nmu libinsane_1.0.7-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> > nmu libkf5sane_20.08.0-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> > nmu wine_5.0-4 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> > nmu pike8.0_8.0.702-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> > nmu pillow-sane_2.8.3-4 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> > nmu libreoffice_1:7.0.1-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> > nmu sane-frontends_1.0.14-16 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> > nmu scanbd_1.5.1-6 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> > nmu simple-scan_3.36.4-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
> > nmu xsane_0.999-9 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against new libsane1.'
>
> I'm not really sure what you're trying to achieve here. You've asked
> for a transition slot (#960046) but completely ignored the moreinfo tag
> and then went ahead anways. In any case, for a proper transition we
> would have tracked binNMUs in that bug report instead of a new one.
>
I refer to the mail from Raphael Hertzog. In [1] he says that the transition is
no longer necessary and that I should ask for a binNMU.
> I think that this effectively reopens #908681 which I will unarchive and
> reopen.
With the Upstream Release 1.0.31 7 functions have been removed. This was also
entered in the changelog and the #MISSING was not removed from the symbols file.
[quote]
* debian/libsane1.symbols:
- Remove 7 not longer available symbols.
[/quote]
>
> Cheers
CU
Jörg
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969291#35
--
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key : 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56
Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31).
Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54470 Lieser
git: https://jff.email/cgit/
Threema: SYR8SJXB
Wire: @joergfringsfuerst
Skype: joergpenguin
Ring: jff
Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst
My wish list:
- Please send me a picture from the nature at your home.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part