Your message dated Sun, 26 Jul 2020 17:09:22 +0200 with message-id <20200726150922.GE3498@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#965972: transition: libasan has caused the Debian Bug report #965972, regarding transition: libasan to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 965972: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965972 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: libasan
- From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 19:32:51 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 3ac10cc3-061e-f9c1-0bc7-3b404def30c1@debian.org>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Two packages are built using the address sanitzer, the binNMUs should be done with an extra b-d on gcc (>= 4:10.1). wlcs goxel
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>, 965972-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#965972: transition: libasan
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 17:09:22 +0200
- Message-id: <20200726150922.GE3498@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20200721210836.GI348847@ramacher.at>
- References: <[🔎] 3ac10cc3-061e-f9c1-0bc7-3b404def30c1@debian.org> <[🔎] 3ac10cc3-061e-f9c1-0bc7-3b404def30c1@debian.org> <[🔎] 20200721210836.GI348847@ramacher.at>
On 2020-07-21 23:08:36 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2020-07-21 19:32:51 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Two packages are built using the address sanitzer, the binNMUs should be done > > with an extra b-d on gcc (>= 4:10.1). > > > > wlcs > > goxel > > binNMUs scheduled … and they migrated. Cheers -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---