[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#963792: marked as done (transition: ros-*)

Your message dated Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:33:31 +0200
with message-id <20200720113331.GB4147430@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#963792: transition: ros-*
has caused the Debian Bug report #963792,
regarding transition: ros-*
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
963792: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963792
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi release team,

I would like to transition these packages to unstable:

ros-roscpp-core
ros-ros-comm
ros-geometric-shapes
ros-urdf
ros-interactive-markers
ros-actionlib
ros-geometry2
ros-vision-opencv

Would you be ok with doing all of them at the same time?
(Otherwise I would start with ros-roscpp-core.)

The generated Ben files are ok.

Cheers Jochen

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2020-07-02 17:08:50 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Hi Jochen
> 
> On 2020-07-01 11:29:53 +0200, jspricke@debian.org wrote:
> > * Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> [2020-07-01 11:22]:
> > > > > * Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> [2020-06-28 22:58]:
> > > > > > > I would like to transition these packages to unstable:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ros-roscpp-core
> > > > > > > ros-ros-comm
> > > > > > > ros-geometric-shapes
> > > > > > > ros-urdf
> > > > > > > ros-interactive-markers
> > > > > > > ros-actionlib
> > > > > > > ros-geometry2
> > > > > > > ros-vision-opencv
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Would you be ok with doing all of them at the same time?
> > > > > > > (Otherwise I would start with ros-roscpp-core.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do all reverse dependencies build fine against the new versions?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes all build fine (sorry for not writing it in the first mail).
> > > > 
> > > > Great, so let's do all of them at once. Feel free to go ahead with the
> > > > uploads to unstable.
> > > 
> > > The binNMus for mrpt (#964044) and ros-rviz failed. Could you please
> > > take a look at ros-rviz?
> > 
> > ros-rviz got stuck in NEW and I didn't notice when testing, sorry. I pinged
> > ftp-masters and will backport the fix tonight, otherwise.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > Fun fact, mrpt compiled fine for me locally.
> 
> The failure appears to be caused by a flaky test.

mrpt got fixed and the old libraries removed from testing.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: