[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#963728: marked as done (transition: protobuf)

Your message dated Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:18:33 +0200
with message-id <20200720071833.GA4147430@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#963728: transition: protobuf
has caused the Debian Bug report #963728,
regarding transition: protobuf
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
963728: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963728
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi RMs,

The new soname release of Protobuf is available in experimental for
some time. Packages starting to need it, thus time for the transition.
According to my testing, the only failing to build packages are mozc,
onnx, vg, ignition-fuel-tools, ignition-transport and gazebo.
Filed bugs for these and recently got a message[1] that another
maintainer re-tested ignition-fuel-tools, ignition-transport and
gazebo. A binNMU would be sufficient for these as well.
The only remaining FTBFS packages are mozc, onnx and vg.

Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/963248#10

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2020-07-08 00:43:04 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On 2020-06-26 09:07:54 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > Hi RMs,
> > 
> > The new soname release of Protobuf is available in experimental for
> > some time. Packages starting to need it, thus time for the transition.
> > According to my testing, the only failing to build packages are mozc,
> > onnx, vg, ignition-fuel-tools, ignition-transport and gazebo.
> > Filed bugs for these and recently got a message[1] that another
> > maintainer re-tested ignition-fuel-tools, ignition-transport and
> > gazebo. A binNMU would be sufficient for these as well.
> > The only remaining FTBFS packages are mozc, onnx and vg.
> 
> Let's do this one.

libprotobuf22 got removed from testing, so that's done.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: