Bug#950488: buster-pu: package kronosnet/1.8-2
wferi@niif.hu writes:
> We'd be immensely grateful for your input on this matter, since your
> position more or less determines how we can plan to support the HA users
> in Debian. We'd still prefer a stable update (either to 1.13 as in the
> original request or to a more recent stable release), but if that isn't
> possible, we'll move forward with backports. (Which isn't a particularly
> appealing option in itself, because the imminent libqb 2 transition will
> cause much churn across the stack.)
Dear Stable Release Team,
Although we've uploaded 1.16-2~bpo10+1 to backports, we'd still be
interested in doing a stable update (as above) if possible. Is there
anything we can do to that end?
--
Thanks,
Feri
Reply to: