Bug#961644: nmu: mumps_5.1.2-4+b2

To: Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>, 961644@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#961644: nmu: mumps_5.1.2-4+b2
From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 15:30:05 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 913c8a7b8ec5987f904c207f39b9ee1b8763d85f.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Reply-to: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, 961644@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <159055446782.109035.13853201275808783969.reportbug@monte.emerall.com>
References: <159055446782.109035.13853201275808783969.reportbug@monte.emerall.com> <159055446782.109035.13853201275808783969.reportbug@monte.emerall.com>

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 12:41 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
> A user reports that libmumps-ptscotch-dev 5.1.2-4+b2 is causing
> segfaults in stable (buster) and needs a rebuild (Bug#954326).

Is this the only report? Can you reproduce the issue?

> The user hasn't provided a test case to confirm the segfault, but
> it won't hurt to run a binNMU anyway.
> 
> nmu mumps_5.1.2-4+b2 . ANY . buster . -m "Rebuild to fix libmumps-
> ptscotch segfault. Closes: #954326."

I'm afraid I'd prefer to know what the actual issue is, rather than
rebuilding to potentially paper over underlying problems.

Regards,

Adam

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#961644: nmu: mumps_5.1.2-4+b2
  - From: Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Processed: retitle 964331 to RM: colorediffs-extension -- RoQA; incompatible with newer Thunderbird versions ...
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#961644: nmu: mumps_5.1.2-4+b2
Previous by thread: Processed: retitle 964331 to RM: colorediffs-extension -- RoQA; incompatible with newer Thunderbird versions ...
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#961644: nmu: mumps_5.1.2-4+b2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread