Your message dated Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:27:15 +0200 with message-id <20200617082715.GA1837464@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#962584: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui has caused the Debian Bug report #962584, regarding transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 962584: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962584 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui
- From: Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:09:50 +0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 159178019053.411480.9630485037236528814.reportbug@aneto>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition On behalf of the GNUstep team I'd like to ask for a slot to carry out a GNUstep transition: libgnustep-base1.26 -> 1.27 libgnustep-gui0.27 -> 0.28 I tested all rdeps; they build successfully on amd64 except cenon.app (#962503). In fact this is a gnustep-gui bug which will be fixed with the upload to unstable so cenon.app can be binNMUed along with the rest of the packages. As always, gnustep-back (the rendering part of the gnustep-gui library) will require a sourceful upload.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>, 962584-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#962584: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:27:15 +0200
- Message-id: <20200617082715.GA1837464@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20200610194717.GE2620454@ramacher.at>
- References: <[🔎] 159178019053.411480.9630485037236528814.reportbug@aneto> <[🔎] 159178019053.411480.9630485037236528814.reportbug@aneto> <[🔎] 20200610194717.GE2620454@ramacher.at>
On 2020-06-10 21:47:17 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On 2020-06-10 12:09:50 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > On behalf of the GNUstep team I'd like to ask for a slot to carry out > > a GNUstep transition: > > > > libgnustep-base1.26 -> 1.27 > > libgnustep-gui0.27 -> 0.28 > > > > I tested all rdeps; they build successfully on amd64 except cenon.app > > (#962503). In fact this is a gnustep-gui bug which will be fixed with > > the upload to unstable so cenon.app can be binNMUed along with the > > rest of the packages. > > > > As always, gnustep-back (the rendering part of the gnustep-gui > > library) will require a sourceful upload. > > Please go ahead with the uploads to unstable. They all migrated, closing. Cheers -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---