[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#962722: marked as done (nmu: md4c_0.4.4-1)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:55:53 +0200
with message-id <20200612205553.GF2706@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#962722: nmu: md4c_0.4.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #962722,
regarding nmu: md4c_0.4.4-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
962722: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962722
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hi,

The last upload of md4c went through NEW and thus I'm requesting a binNMU to have the amd64 packages rebuilt on buildd, such that the package can transition to testing.

nmu md4c_0.4.4-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild amd64 package on the buildd so it can transition."


--
Med vänliga hälsningar

Patrick Franz

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2020-06-12 20:44:23 +0200, Patrick Franz wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The last upload of md4c went through NEW and thus I'm requesting a binNMU to have the amd64 packages rebuilt on buildd, such that the package can transition to testing.
> 
> nmu md4c_0.4.4-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild amd64 package on the buildd so it can transition."

Scheduled, but binNMUed everywhere since the package provides MA: same
binaries.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: