Bug#960193: ICU rebuilds
On 10/06/2020 19:03, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> On 2020-06-10 18:28:24 +0100, Peter wrote:
>> On 09/06/2020 21:19, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> On 2020-06-09 19:56:00 +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:15 PM Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org> wrote:
>>>>> can you please rebuild for the ICU transition also the packages in
>>>>> experimental?
>>>> I can't schedule binNMUs myself, but Sebastian can.
>>>>
>>>> Please, if you have time schedule binNMUs of the following packages
>>>> with ICU 67.1 in _experimental_:
>>>>> dcmtk
>>>>> gnustep-base
>>>>> gnustep-gui
>>>>> libqalculate
>>>>> performous
>>>>> qtbase-opensource-src
>>>>> qtlocation-opensource-src
>>>>> qtwebkit-opensource-src
>>>>> webkit2gtk
>>>>> zimwriterfs
>>> Scheduled.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please could someone add qosmic to the binNMU list?
>> { https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962095 }
> Why would it need a binNMU? It doesn't depend on libicu63.
>
> Cheers
Hi Sebastian,
I'm just a little wary of the dependency chain
qosmic -> flam3 -> libxml2 -> libicu67
given that qosmic was built against ICU 63 headers, and flam3 has a static library.
That said, I can find no obvious problem, guess I'm just being overly cautious here.
Will there be a full rebuild of the archive for Bullseye anyway?
Cheers,
Peter
Reply to: