Your message dated Sun, 31 May 2020 20:29:18 +0200 with message-id <7f60b78d-6907-a4f4-ce15-85a5ba234018@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#894049: transition: ncurses has caused the Debian Bug report #894049, regarding transition: ncurses to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 894049: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894049 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: ncurses
- From: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 21:51:37 +0200
- Message-id: <87a7uwx7au.fsf@turtle.gmx.de>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition I would like to start a transition for ncurses, changing the soname of the libraries from 5 to 6. This affects a large number of packages (about 600 of them), but should be doable almost exclusively via binNMUs, with two exceptions: - libcdk5 needs a sourceful upload and a rename of the library package, neither this package nor its three reverse dependencies should be rebuilt before that. Please see https://bugs.debian.org/892280 and https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libcdk5.html. - cwidget also needs a sourceful upload and either a package rename or a shlibs bump + versioned Breaks against aptitude, please see https://bugs.debian.org/891161 for details. Fortunately both cwidget and aptitude currently FTBFS with libncursesw6, so there is no danger of incompatible combinations after binNMUs. The packages libtinfo5, libncurses5 and libncursesw5 are still built, so only packages depending on the multilib packages and the udeb become uninstallable and need to be rebuilt right away: grub, readline and screen. Apart from cwidget/aptitude, I have not noticed any ncurses related FTBFS bugs, and the API is unchanged. However, there will certainly be quite a few unrelated FTBFS problems, such as the recent switch to openjdk-9 and the python3.6/python3-distutils breakage. Suggested ben file (please check if it is correct): title = "ncurses"; is_affected = .depends ~ /\b(lib32ncurses6|lib32ncursesw6|lib32tinfo6|lib64ncurses6|lib64ncursesw6|lib64tinfo6|libncurses6|libncursesw6|libtinfo6|libtinfo6\-udeb|lib32ncurses5|lib32ncursesw5|lib32tinfo5|lib64ncurses5|lib64tinfo5|libncurses5|libncursesw5|libtinfo5|libtinfo5\-udeb)\b/; is_good = .depends ~ /\b(lib32ncurses6|lib32ncursesw6|lib32tinfo6|lib64ncurses6|lib64ncursesw6|lib64tinfo6|libncurses6|libncursesw6|libtinfo6|libtinfo6\-udeb)\b/; is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(lib32ncurses5|lib32ncursesw5|lib32tinfo5|lib64ncurses5|lib64tinfo5|libncurses5|libncursesw5|libtinfo5|libtinfo5\-udeb)\b/ & ! .package ~ /\b(libncursesw5|libncurses5)\b/; Thanks for your consideration, SvenAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 894049-done@bugs.debian.org, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
- Subject: Re: Bug#894049: transition: ncurses
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 20:29:18 +0200
- Message-id: <7f60b78d-6907-a4f4-ce15-85a5ba234018@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <05966eb8-0e85-a4ca-5a6e-3e33a3ff01a1@debian.org>
- References: <87a7uwx7au.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87a7uwx7au.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87zi17limg.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <591026e8-99ef-8197-438a-2e2eddf36138@debian.org> <87a7uwx7au.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87o9hldzbb.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <47ad3620-fa9b-cea3-9450-3a266a2ba28f@debian.org> <87mux4d75l.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <c40967d5-82a4-bb69-e594-e2cd8fbbb278@debian.org> <87603sd5ia.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87603sd5ia.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <05966eb8-0e85-a4ca-5a6e-3e33a3ff01a1@debian.org>
Hi, On 12-09-2019 11:18, Paul Gevers wrote: > Let's move this report a bit out of the way, but not close it as it > isn't really finished. I think it's all done now. The last pieces of *this* transition are gone. PaulAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---