Hi On 2020-05-12 11:27:32 +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: > Il 12/05/20 10:05, Sebastian Ramacher ha scritto: > > I can help with filing those bugs so we can get that transition ready. > > Thanks. According to my notes, the packages that fail to build with 1.71 > (and do not fail with 1.67) that still require bug filing are these: > > cupt Filed > dds Filed > ecflow Couldn't reproduce this issue. Seems to be fixed. > facter Filed, but I think that's due to both boost 1.67 and boost 1.71 being linked through dependencies. This might be resolved when the actual rebuilds are done. > flightgear Filed > gatb-core Filed > leatherman Filed > libkolabxml Filed > libpwiz Filed > meson Couldn't reproduce this issue. Seems to be fixed. > mongodb Removed from the archive > ncbi-blast+ Couldn't reproduce this issue. > progressivemauve Uninstallability caused by libmems-dev which should be fixed after the libmems rebuild. > simgear Filed > svgpp Filed > thrift Couldn't reproduce this issue. > zypper (although the bug is in libzypp, I believe) Not sure where the best place to fix this is. Boost's tribool now requires explicit casts to bool and libzypp's tribool is just a typedef. So filed against zypper. > This list was created some months ago, so things might have shifted a > little bit by now. It should be more or less representative, though. The > build logs I got are here: > > https://people.debian.org/~gio/boost_migration/ > > Attached, in case it helps, is the mail template I am using for this > run. If you want to use another one no problem, but please include the > usertag data. Thanks, I've set the usertags everywhere. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature