Bug#956890: buster-pu: package zfs-linux/0.7.12-2+deb10u2

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 18:07 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 15:52 +0000, Mo Zhou wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 03:25:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 05:21 +0000, Mo Zhou wrote:
> > > > The whole fix involes two parts: a part goes to src:zfs-linux
> > > > and
> > > > the
> > > > other goes to src:spl-linux. Now that the updated src:spl-linux
> > > > is
> > > > already uploaded, and I'm now asking for the permission to
> > > > upload
> > > > the
> > > > updated src:zfs-linux. Which includes two upstream commits
> > > > fixing
> > > > potential deadlock issues.
> > > 
> > > What happens if a user tries using the current spl-dkms with the
> > > newer
> > > zfs-dkms, or vice versa?
> > 
> > I forgot to add Depends: spl-dkms (>= 0.7.12-2+deb10u1, s-p-u) into
> > the debdiff of zfs-linux.
> 
> OK. With that change included, please feel free to go ahead.
> 
> > Actually zfs-linux (= 0.7.12-2+deb10u1, buster) have no problem to
> > build atop spl-linux (= 0.7.12-2, buster) or (= 0.7.12-2+deb10u1,
> > s-
> > p-u); while zfs-linux (= 0.7.12-2+deb10u2, s-p-u) will FTBFS atop
> > spl-linux  (= 0.7.12-2, buster)
> > 
> 
> So it's fine to accept spl-linux now, without causing any issues?

Ping? (On both this question and the zfs-linux upload.)

The window for getting fixes into 10.4 closes during this weekend.

Regards,

Adam