Bug#893439: stretch-pu: package gnucash/1:2.6.15-1+deb9u1
- To: László Böszörményi <gcs@debian.org>, 893439@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
- Subject: Bug#893439: stretch-pu: package gnucash/1:2.6.15-1+deb9u1
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 17:57:29 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20200426155729.GA11902@chou>
- Reply-to: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>, 893439@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <CAKjSHr2R_=81K2+t3+2Q8dM5jBmDqQy53ga4n5+E9FsgHsugdQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20180402110539.va5y7qqasenr5miv@betterave.cristau.org> <20180402115154.GK9516@localhost> <152140364503.31297.17879539345379261340.reportbug@localhost> <20180402132056.paiukaqpzm7dc3pt@betterave.cristau.org> <1538845640.3050.23.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk> <152140364503.31297.17879539345379261340.reportbug@localhost> <CAKjSHr2R_=81K2+t3+2Q8dM5jBmDqQy53ga4n5+E9FsgHsugdQ@mail.gmail.com> <152140364503.31297.17879539345379261340.reportbug@localhost>
Control: reassign -1 pu: libdbi/0.9.0-4+deb9u2
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 07:29:32AM +0100, László Böszörményi wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 7:07 PM Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > László: ping?
> >
> > On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 15:20 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 14:51:54 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 01:05:39PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 22:07:25 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > > libdbi 0.9.0-4+deb9u1 broke gnucash tests, runtime issues
> > > > > > with this backend were so far not reported but are not
> > > > > > unlikely.
> > [...]
> > > So the other option here would be to revert the libdbi change. As
> > > far as I can tell from #880896 it wasn't prompted by a specific
> > > problem, so a revert there might be the safest course of action and
> > > sidesteps the gnucash issue. László, any thoughts?
> Indeed, that change is better reverted. I've proposed a patch on
> #884119 [1]. Can I upload it to Stretch or should file a separate PU
> proposal?
>
Please go ahead and upload to stretch. Repurposing this bug for the
libdbi update.
Cheers,
Julien
Reply to: