Bug#944538: buster-pu: package ganeti-instance-debootstrap/0.16-6.1

[Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>]

On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 05:21:21PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> [sorry for the dupe, hit send by mistake :(]
> 
> On 2019-11-24 12:13:20, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > On 2019-11-23 18:34:25, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> I'm a bit uneasy about a blanket "include all", to be honest.  It's
> >> probably harmless since it's all coming straight out of debootstrap, but
> >> I'd have been happier with something like "include security.*" if that's
> >> what we expect to see.
> >
> > What kind of problems would you expect with including too many ACLs?
> 
> I'm still curious to hear what kind of problems you expect here. I've
> been running this patch in production for months now and would really
> like to see this land in buster (and hopefully stretch next).
> 
I don't know, that's kind of the point.  For changes in stable I tend to
err on the side of "if there's no demonstrated need for a change then it
shouldn't be done".  Things like "because why not" tend to be red flags.

Cheers,
Julien