Bug#947165: marked as done (transition: llvm-defaults to 9)

["Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>]

Your message dated Sat, 25 Apr 2020 08:56:44 +0200
with message-id <daef9ca2-f5da-71f5-f00f-6924af52927e@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#947165: transition: llvm-defaults to 9
has caused the Debian Bug report #947165,
regarding transition: llvm-defaults to 9
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
947165: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947165
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- Begin Message ---

• To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
• Subject: transition: llvm-defaults to 9
• From: Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org>
• Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 11:57:00 +0100
• Message-id: <375f4d44-c0b9-09e7-f736-f48475966e25@debian.org>

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hello,

LLVM 9.0.1 has just been released. I am not planning to spend significant time on the -8 branch.
It is therefor time to move to the version 9

Thanks,
Sylvestre

Ben file:

title = "llvm-defaults";

Affected: .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-?[3456789]/
Good: .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-?[9]/
Bad: .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-?[345678]/

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message ---

• To: 947165-done@bugs.debian.org
• Subject: Re: Bug#947165: transition: llvm-defaults to 9
• From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
• Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 08:56:44 +0200
• Message-id: <daef9ca2-f5da-71f5-f00f-6924af52927e@debian.org>
• In-reply-to: <339721af-9f3f-95e6-913c-7e6e69030f1d@debian.org>
• References: <375f4d44-c0b9-09e7-f736-f48475966e25@debian.org> <43e3b1c2-3a5b-5b1c-39b5-09d603fbe0d1@debian.org> <375f4d44-c0b9-09e7-f736-f48475966e25@debian.org> <8b1cdb30-3fc4-0957-313a-b6f6f6549cda@debian.org> <375f4d44-c0b9-09e7-f736-f48475966e25@debian.org> <c459e2e7-8d1b-5772-c695-ab01f60661a4@debian.org> <375f4d44-c0b9-09e7-f736-f48475966e25@debian.org> <20200101155200.GA26645@localhost> <035a8a29-fe94-eac6-d0ad-5d3ec8aa6979@debian.org> <339721af-9f3f-95e6-913c-7e6e69030f1d@debian.org>

Hi,

On 12-01-2020 20:43, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 03-01-2020 07:56, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> We currently have a bit much transitions going on (and some backslash
>> from a piuparts bug), so I'd like to get a bit of those transitions off
>> the table before starting this one.
>>
>> I'll let you know, probably in a week or so.
> 
> Please go ahead.

This has been finished a while ago.
rust-clang-sys is a false positive

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--- End Message ---