Bug#952634: marked as done (nmu: gunroar_0.15.dfsg1-9, parsec47_0.2.dfsg1-9)
Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:17:56 +0200
with message-id <CAM8zJQtyyHvxHLrCkOOLkBDxdRhRUBYA5ygeO1uUmOmNdrQKQw@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#952634: nmu: gunroar_0.15.dfsg1-9, parsec47_0.2.dfsg1-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #952634,
regarding nmu: gunroar_0.15.dfsg1-9, parsec47_0.2.dfsg1-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
952634: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952634
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu gunroar_0.15.dfsg1-9 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against libphobos76 from gcc-9"
nmu parsec47_0.2.dfsg1-9 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against libphobos76 from gcc-9"
Quoting doko from #950747 for a similar issue in projectl:
> this is a won't fix. It will be addressed when GCC 10 becomes the default
> compiler (and libgphobos changes the soname). There is now a binNMU for projectl.
So let's binNMU them as a temporary measure to mitigate #951423, #951294.
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 19:03, Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org> wrote:
> nmu gunroar_0.15.dfsg1-9 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against libphobos76 from gcc-9"
> nmu parsec47_0.2.dfsg1-9 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against libphobos76 from gcc-9"
Scheduled, thanks!
--- End Message ---
Reply to: