[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#949135: marked as done (transition: netcdf-fortran)



Your message dated Sun, 16 Feb 2020 06:49:15 +0100
with message-id <b12acc59-a769-8e91-0583-15fad07aa18f@xs4all.nl>
and subject line transition: netcdf-fortran
has caused the Debian Bug report #949135,
regarding transition: netcdf-fortran
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
949135: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949135
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-netcdf-fortran.html
Control: block -1 by 949132 949134

netcdf-fortran bumped its SONAME requiring a transition.

Most rdeps built successfully, two FTBFS due to unrelated issues as summarized below.


Transition: netcdf-fortran

 libnetcdff6 (4.4.5-1+b1) -> libnetcdff7 (4.5.2+ds-1~exp1)

The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows.

 cdftools   (3.0.2-3)              FTBFS (#949132)
 etsf-io    (1.0.4-4)              OK
 ferret-vis (7.5.0-2)              OK
 ncl        (6.6.2-1)              SKIP
 oasis3     (3.mct+dfsg.121022-13) FTBFS (#949134)

 pyferret   (7.5.0-2)              OK


Kind Regards,

Bas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
oasis3 & cdftools got fixed, and the latter finally migrated to testing
completing this transition.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

--- End Message ---

Reply to: