Your message dated Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:41:48 +0100 with message-id <4f240378-deab-eee4-3553-57d5d9db298c@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#946119: binNMU for gudhi, openems, and pygalmesh has caused the Debian Bug report #946119, regarding binNMU for gudhi, openems, and pygalmesh to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 946119: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946119 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: binNMU for gudhi, openems, and pygalmesh
- From: Joachim Reichel <reichel@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:02:26 +0100
- Message-id: <157541414659.12825.15376330807664695975.reportbug@enterprise-e>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Control: block 944417 by -1 Hi, please schedule binNMUs for gudhi, openems, and pygalmesh to support the cgal_5.0 transition (see bug #944417). nmu gudhi_3.0.0+dfsg-3 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against libcgal-dev >= 5.0' dw gudhi_3.0.0+dfsg-3 . ANY . -m 'libcgal-dev (>= 5.0)' nmu openems_0.0.35+git20190103.6a75e98+dfsg.1-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against libcgal-dev >= 5.0' dw openems_0.0.35+git20190103.6a75e98+dfsg.1-1 . ANY . -m 'libcgal-dev (>= 5.0)' nmu pygalmesh_0.4.0-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against libcgal-dev >= 5.0' dw pygalmesh_0.4.0-1 . ANY . -m 'libcgal-dev (>= 5.0)' Best regards, Joachim
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Joachim Reichel <reichel@debian.org>, 946119-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#946119: binNMU for gudhi, openems, and pygalmesh
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:41:48 +0100
- Message-id: <4f240378-deab-eee4-3553-57d5d9db298c@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <915a929e-c9a5-0c7b-903a-fcba334e1f89@debian.org>
- References: <157541414659.12825.15376330807664695975.reportbug@enterprise-e> <915a929e-c9a5-0c7b-903a-fcba334e1f89@debian.org>
Hi Joachim, On 05-12-2019 10:20, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 04-12-2019 00:02, Joachim Reichel wrote: >> please schedule binNMUs for gudhi, openems, and pygalmesh to support the >> cgal_5.0 transition (see bug #944417). >> >> nmu gudhi_3.0.0+dfsg-3 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against libcgal-dev >= 5.0' >> dw gudhi_3.0.0+dfsg-3 . ANY . -m 'libcgal-dev (>= 5.0)' >> nmu openems_0.0.35+git20190103.6a75e98+dfsg.1-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against libcgal-dev >= 5.0' >> dw openems_0.0.35+git20190103.6a75e98+dfsg.1-1 . ANY . -m 'libcgal-dev (>= 5.0)' >> nmu pygalmesh_0.4.0-1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild against libcgal-dev >= 5.0' >> dw pygalmesh_0.4.0-1 . ANY . -m 'libcgal-dev (>= 5.0)' > > Will do something like that shortly. The cgal transition finished a while ago, closing this bug. PaulAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---