[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#949724: marked as done (nmu: kalzium_4:19.08.1-1)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Jan 2020 22:24:26 +0100
with message-id <60a1c690-d73a-0151-67e9-6390dee95568@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#949724: nmu: kalzium_4:19.08.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #949724,
regarding nmu: kalzium_4:19.08.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
949724: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949724
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Control: block 948477 by -1

nmu kalzium_4:19.08.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m 'Rebuild with
libopenbabel-dev >= 3.0.0+dfsg-2'

Hello,

To complete the auto-openbabel transition [1], kalzium has to be rebuilt
to use libopenbabel6 instead of libopenbabel5.

Thanks,
Andrius

[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-openbabel.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Andrius,

On 24-01-2020 08:03, merkys@debian.org wrote:
> nmu kalzium_4:19.08.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m 'Rebuild with
> libopenbabel-dev >= 3.0.0+dfsg-2'

Scheduled.

> To complete the auto-openbabel transition [1], kalzium has to be rebuilt
> to use libopenbabel6 instead of libopenbabel5.

For next time, if there is a transition bug open, this request is better
done in the transition bug instead of filing a new bug.

Thanks.

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: