buster-ignore for armel/armhf alignment bugs?
Hi,
what is the SRM opinion on the armel/armhf alignment bugs that are
exposed by building/running on 64-bit hardware that does not fix up
misaligned accesses?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=alignment;users=debian-arm@lists.debian.org
The fixed bugs in this list are currently
* fixed in buster (adios, mash, coturn)
* fixed in sid (pywavelets, ndpi, nsis, ruby-ferret)
* RMed from sid (pythonqt)
Is it worth fixing them in buster point releases (i.e. are 32-bit arm
buildds running on 64-bit hardware something that will be needed during
the buster life cycle)? Or should we tag them 'buster-ignore'? (I think
tagging them 'bullseye sid' would be wrong.)
Andreas
(pondering whether it's worth to buster-pu pywavelets)
Reply to: