Control: tags -1 wontfix Control: close -1 Hi Matthias, On 06-06-2019 12:01, Paul Gevers wrote:> doko, I know you are maintaining quite some key packages, so extra work> is probably not what you are looking for, but neither are we and on top> of that, we don't like turning down unblock request (hence the time it> took to reply, at least that's the reason for me). In this case, and> also for gcc-7 (hence cc of that bug) it would be great if we could> understand from the beginning why you believe why we should except this.> And no, I am not going to find upstream repositories and bug trackers> for all the packages that we get unblock requests for. You'll have to> help us making the judgment. I take the lack of reply from your side to mean that you are not pursuing to drive this further to an unblock. To clean up the unblock that probably will not see any further action, I am closing it as wontfix. If you are still interested, you can of course reopen, but be aware that the time for unblocks for buster is running out quickly now [1]. Sorry. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/06/msg00003.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature