Bug#928882: unblock: [pre-approval] ghc/8.4.4+dfsg1-3
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 05:06PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Am I correct when I say this is no regression? I.e. it has always been
> like that?
I am not sure about this. The current mechanism of using the
llvm-targets file was introduced in version 8.4.1 [1] replacing the
previously hard-coded data layouts. So the faulty Debian patch was
introduced during the buster development cycle.
[1] https://github.com/ghc/ghc/commit/22733532171
> > 2) binNMU on armel, all packages that were built with ghc
>
> How much are we talking about? This might be a bit big.
$ grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends ghc -s Package \
/var/lib/apt/lists/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_buster_main_source_Sources \
| wc -l
1017
It is a bit big, but if everything goes well, it should be painless
(i.e., just schedule the binNMUs).
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 07:55PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Maybe use experimental for this run then? Or debomatic (which I use to
> compile for my QNAP as well).
In order to use experimental, we will have to prepare source-full uploads
for 1017 packages, right? I am not familiar with debomatic, could you
please elaborate on this?
Thanks,
--
Ilias
Reply to: