Control: tags -1 moreinfo Control: block -1 by 928097 Hi László, On Sun, 5 May 2019 18:40:51 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= <gcs@debian.org> wrote: > Chromium is a bit bigger than me, but as I've experienced it's one of > its pre-checks with an assert. As the size of the Unicode set is now > bigger due to the addition of the new Japanese era it fails. Call it a > lame check, but I tested this case vice-versa: built Chromium with ICU > 63.2, then installed it with ICU 63.1 and it doesn't fail but working > normally. Did you file a bug against chromium already about this? They should improve the test to not fail like this in the future. If you haven't done so, please file the bug ASAP. On top of that, your package will have to add a versioned Breaks on the latest chromium that is built against the current version of icu. This has to be set when the package can be uploaded to unstable. Now is not the time yet, see below. Unfortunately, the state of chromium at this moment doesn't allow us to rebuild and have the package migrate to buster as chromium FTBFS on arm64 and the package is newer in unstable. You'll have to wait until that situation improves. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature